This review is temporarily down Normally, when 4thWay’s specialists reassess peer-to-peer lending providers and other online direct lending providers on behalf of individual lenders, the new assessment is put up on the 4thWay website with no downtime in between. However, perhaps once per year on…
LEND.ch is a Swiss peer-to-peer lending provider offering lending in Swiss francs (CHF). It hasn’t opened up to 4thWay’s specialists with data and access to its key people and therefore we haven’t conducted our usual week’s long assessment of it. So this is kind of…
Update: the first answer was corrected on 10th June after a stupid error by me. My apologies. On the positive side, on the 11th June HMRC explicitly confirmed to 4thWay that our second answer is correct. We have two questions on flexible ISAs and one…
Occasionally lenders reach out to 4thWay and describe what they are up to, how they’re doing and what their experiences have been when lending. I really appreciate the contact from you! Recently I had an email that inspired me to write this page today. I’m…
The people normally using 4thWay’s research are all very lucky. I mean, I presume you have money to spare if you’re lending it. There are an awful lot of people who can’t say the same. Yet I think it’s worth looking at the other side…
This update on 29th April 2025 is writing up a case in the High Court in February 2025. The judgment on the case was made on 17th April 2025 and it has just landed in my hands. Since the case is now on the public…
Housemartin’s P2P Lending Account And IFISA And Classic Account has earned an Exceptional 3/3 4thWay PLUS Rating. These loans have been paying lenders around of the loan amount in interest, after bad debts. Visit Housemartin* or keep reading the Housemartin Review.
However, I’m not going to remind you what the latest property-price forecasts from the UK’s best-known economists are for 2025 or the next 12 months. If you want to know, you’ll have to look them up yourselves. Here’s why… What happened in 2024? To start…
My team and I have been assessing P2P lending accounts since 2014 and we continue to have a 100% record. (We won’t always get all the most important calls right – that’s impossible in investing – but we expect that we almost always will.) My…
This content today is extremely different to normal, but I need to get it out, as it’s pressing on my mind. Unusually, this page is not about a cold assessment of an investment provider or lending tips. Instead, it’s all about me. I have to…
Lendwise’s lending accounts are unrated. These loans are expected to pay lenders around after bad debts. Visit Lendwise or keep reading the Lendwise Review.
Proplend’s Tranche A, 0-50% LTV Lending Against Property Mostly Receiving Rent received an Exceptional 3/3 4thWay PLUS Rating. These loans have been paying interest after bad debts. Visit Proplend* or keep reading the Proplend Review.
Initially published well over a year ago, this page has been updated in March 2025. P2P lending companies’ financial health is of great interest to lenders and of course to us at 4thWay. If a P2P lending company is already making money then it lowers…
What are the best Innovative Finance ISAs? The best innovative finance ISAs are these nine, which offer a market-leading risk-reward balance: CapitalRise IFISA. (Minimum £1,000 per loan.) CapitalStackers IFISA. (Minimum £2,500 per loan.) Housemartin IFISA. (Minimum £1 per loan.) Invest & Fund IFISA. (Minimum £2,500,…
Your main protection is that loans and cash are segregated Firstly, lets get a sense of proportion. Because FSCS protection here is actually a very minor point. If you have loans at a P2P lending company or if that site is holding some of your…
Lande* was the first ever P2P lending company in either the eurozone or continental Europe to be fully assessed by 4thWay. What does Lande do? Lande’s borrowers are Latvian, Lithuanian and Romanian businesses – mostly farmers. The loans usually secured on the farmer’s land or…
With double-digit realised gains so far, returns of 20%+ highly possible, and being unaligned with recessions and property crashes, why wouldn’t you consider this opportunity? Before you read on, AxiaFunder is available to you only if you have invested at least £10,000 in unlisted investments…
Blend’s Development And Property-Secured Business Loans are unrated, due to lack of information. These loans have been paying lenders around . Visit Blend or keep reading the Blend Review.
Somo’s Bridging Lending Account received an Exceptional 3/3 4thWay PLUS Rating. These loans have been paying lenders . That’s before bad debts, although historically losses have been virtually zero. Visit Somo* or keep reading the Somo Review.
Somo’s Bridging Lending Account received an Exceptional 3/3 4thWay PLUS Rating. These loans have been paying lenders . That’s before bad debts, although historically losses have been virtually zero. Visit Somo* or keep reading the Somo Review.
Before you read on, note that there’s a high minimum lending amount of £5,000 per loan.
Plus, to use Somo, you need to:
Somo* does short-term property (bridging) loans typically from £30,000 to £1.5 million, mostly on residential property.
The loans can be for two years, but most loans are shorter than that and on average they’re repaid after about 12 months. Borrowers often pay the loan and all the interest in one go at the end.
Somo started doing loans through its online lending platform in 2015, although non-platform lending started in 2010.
Total lending from April 2017 to now in 2025 has been £363 million. Possibly a further £70 million was lent between 2010 and 2017.
Somo has provided a large amount of historical data, access to key people, and responses to our queries, and maintained this transparency for over a year. We see that it has kept up attractive lending rates even as it’s grown, while maintaining its lending standards.
Based on all the information and data available to 4thWay – which is a lot now – Somo’s claims to have processed thousands of loans over many years and never lost money are highly plausible.
It approves a lot of loans, so that you have a lot of opportunities to lend in. And yet lenders have reliably been paid back over a long period of time.
The split between senior and junior lending is currently around one-to-two in favour of junior lending.
With junior loans, you’re second or sometimes even third in the queue to get your money back if the borrower’s property needs to be repossessed and sold. For the additional risk of not being paid first, you’re currently earning about 11% on average.
The typical loan size of 61.67% of the property valuation is highly creditable for junior lending. The lender that is senior to you, which will typically be a bank, usually holds just a small share (which is better for you), averaging 37.95%.
You’re getting 9.39% on senior lending, with the average loan amount being just 55.13%, which is very low.
The maximum you will lend through Somo* on most types of loans is 70%. Somo does go up to 75%, but that is always funded externally, i.e. not through the online lending platform that you will be lending through.
70% is a tick up on the 65% Somo started at when it launched, but it’s still a solid maximum loan amount for these kinds of loans. It’s reassuring to see that overall the ratios remain very steady over a long time period.
The overall average loan size compared to the property valuation is 58.66%, which is pretty much where it was in 2016. This is somewhat on the lower (i.e. better) side compared to competing providers with similar quality loans.
Somo doesn’t do full-on development loans, and yet borrowers can use the bridging loans for heavy refurbishments and other bespoke projects. I’m pleased to see that in these cases Somo bases its decisions on the current property valuation, not the hoped-for future value after works are completed.
Some additional reassurance is offered by the fact that Somo will pay out to lenders all its fees earned on a loan if that loan turns bad and isn’t recovered in full.
Somo* has proven itself over many years, and my assessment is that this family business has all of the relevant skills and experience we’d expect to see in property lending and bad-debt recovery. It also has complementary skills, such as relevant legal backgrounds. The latter is nice to have, since legal matters are usually outsourced.
Somo has no specialists for quantitative risk modelling, but such modelling is unusual in this kind of lending.
Somo talked us through its lending processes, which are high quality, professional and appropriate for these kinds of loans.
Its processes centre around looking for a margin of safety in worst-case scenarios and – very important for this kind of lending – a strong and realistic exit strategy for repaying the loan.
Fraud can be a problem in property lending, but clearly Somo has this very firmly in hand.
It’s lending processes reveal a deep familiarity with all of the possible risks that can occur in this kind of lending, even long-shot risks, and it has these in mind when reviewing borrowers. The lengths they go to are beyond what I’m used to seeing in bridging lending.
That said, Somo’s overwhelming focus is on quality of the property security rather than quality of the borrower. While this leads to a lot of loans falling behind schedule and even needing legal action, its bad-debt recovery processes kick in suitably quickly (indeed, aggressively).
Rapid action is an absolute necessity for these kinds of loans to reduce the risk of losses, and so Somo* has an impeccable record of paying lenders in full.
You earn interest while waiting for the bad debts to be recovered. This is important, because, despite acting quickly, getting the recovery can sometimes take a very long time.
Somo lenders are currently earning 10.47%.
Over many years, lenders have lost just a very, very small amount of interest to bad debts, imperceptibly impacting the overall return. Lenders have lost none of the money they put into any loan.
At the same time, lenders have earned around £30 million in the past eight years alone.
A super important question for 4thWay to look into is always whether a provider is kicking the can of bad debt down the road, by extending loans and re-lending to borrowers. That would lead to a massive collapse for lenders at a later date. I’m glad to report it has not been doing so.
Just to pull out one of the features of the detailed historical data provided to us, looking at the oldest half of all the loans, barely one month’s interest has been lost to lenders overall on the loans that suffered problems during those years. That’s one month out of dozens of months.
We conduct stress tests that calculate what might happen to lenders putting their money in today, if there was a sudden, severe recession and major property crash.
In so doing, we find that Somo lenders who spread across lots of loans and keep lending for two years are still very well protected from the risk of losses. The returns offered by Somo are attractive versus the risks.
Somo* provides 4thWay with sufficient access and information for us to assess it on an ongoing basis. There remain a few gaps, but these are minor as the rest were filled in last year, in 2024.
A small disappointment is that it’s only able to provide its most detailed data starting from April 2017, which was three years after it started. Nevertheless, there’s a history of lots of loans in that data, and we are able to combine it with other submissions, evidence and sources.
When it comes to providing information to you lenders directly, unfortunately you have to sign up and log in, and then click on its logo and scroll to the bottom of the page, in order to see its lending statistics and even the website’s FAQ page!
Its website statistics for lenders are primitive and often somewhat out-of-date, but still useful for you. Somo should provide a lot more information on its people to its website users as well.
Independently audited accounts from Somo* show that it has made large profits for many years; for example, between £3.9 million and £5.1 million over the past four years.
This record is still unusual in this industry, where many companies are only now beginning to show smaller profits. Indeed, Somo is number one on the list in The 3 P2P Lending Providers With The Best Financial Health.
I don’t know the auditors, but it’s always good to see that an auditor has given a clean bill of health.
Somo’s website security is in great shape, according to information provided to 4thWay by Sucuri. It finds no known malware, website errors, out-of-date software or entries on blacklists.
Somo’s website is listed as clean by Google Safe Browsing, McAfee and Yandex. The website is secure and carries a valid security certificate, helping to protect you when you supply your personal data. It has a firewall in place, which helps to block outsiders getting access to the data Somo holds.
This assessment is not based on a full attempt to penetrate the website’s security, but rather on arm’s length tests.
Wealthier lenders should feel reassured by Somo’s exceptional record, experienced team, and its rapid, successful response to problem loans. I certainly think Somo* is a good investment if you put your money in lots of loans.
Somo is very exclusive, with a high minimum of £5,000 per loan.
You choose all your loans yourself. Somo has been approving over 30 property loans per month for the past few years (although a bit less during the winter months), so I expect it will be easy to build up a portfolio of loans pretty quickly.
Somo does not have an IFISA.
You can sell your loan parts to other lenders or to Somo, if either are willing to buy, through its online secondary market. Somo* makes no charge for this.
You can list your loan parts for sale for the full amount. Alternatively, if you want, you can sell your loans for a discount. E.g. if you want to sell a £10,000 loan part, you might try to speed up the sale by offering it for £9,800.
Somo has a great record of enabling a very swift sale, but you just have to realise that this will not always be the case. You absolutely have to understand that at some point your money is likely to be tied up for longer, because that is simply the nature of money lending. That is even the case at high-quality online lending providers, since market forces are not under their control.
If you can’t live with that, you should lend less money.
Most providers argue that lenders pay no fees and Somo takes the same position.
However, I assess your true costs in the same way that I previously used to assess costs in investment funds. (And fund analysts to this day still continue to do the same.)
To that end, 4thWay’s specialists look at what the borrower is paying in order to borrow money from you (the fees and interest). We then convert all the fees and interest into an annualised rate, deduct from that the annualised amount that Somo passes on to you, and then the difference is Somo’s cut.
The larger the cut, the less downside protection you have and the lower your lending returns.
I find that the costs are very reasonable for these kinds of loans, considering the large amount of human effort required in pulling in borrowers and assessing them, as well as taking care of problem loans.
I estimate lending costs are a little over 5% of the loan amount. These all-in costs compare pretty well to Somo’s most similar competitors.
Unusually in this wider industry, online direct lending through Somo* is not regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority or any other authority. You’re also not likely to be able to complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service.
Somo is what 4thWay would define as peer-to-peer lending as the risks are effectively approximately the same as direct lending to the end borrower, but our definition is not the same as others. Read about Somo’s structure here.
Somo’s structure and lending contracts are such that, for tax purposes, you won’t be able to offset any losses at Somo with gains at other P2P lending companies, and vice versa.
However, interest is technically paid to you from a trust. I’m not an accountant, but I think it’s therefore likely that lending through Somo qualifies you for three tax breaks: the income-tax personal allowance, the starting rate for savings and the personal savings allowance. Read more on those in How Does Peer-to-Peer Lending Tax Work?
Thank you for reading the Somo Review! Visit Somo*.
3 PLUSes is best. What does the 4thWay PLUS Rating tell you about the risks and rewards?
Here we show the P2P lending site's own estimate (or 4thWay's if theirs are not appropriate)
Lower Risk Scores are better. How is this different to the 4thWay PLUS Rating?
£326 m since 2014 in secured short-term (bridging) loans, with early exit. MIN £5,000 PER LOAN. SOPHISTICATED/WEALTHY INVESTORS ONLY
Early exit is not guaranteed. Usually, other lenders need to buy your loans
Independent opinion: 4thWay will help you to identify your options and narrow down your choices. We suggest what you could do, but we won't tell you what to do or where to lend; the decision is yours. We are responsible for the accuracy and quality of the information we provide, but not for any decision you make based on it. The material is for general information and education purposes only.
We are not financial, legal or tax advisors, which means that we don't offer advice or recommendations based on your circumstances and goals.
The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and not held by 4thWay. 4thWay is not regulated by ESMA or the FCA. All the specialists and researchers who conduct research and write articles for 4thWay are subject to 4thWay's Editorial Code of Practice. For more, please see 4thWay's terms and conditions.
The 4thWay® PLUS Ratings are calculations developed by professional risk modellers (someone who models risks for the banks), experienced investors and a debt specialist from one of the major consultancy firms. They measure the interest you earn against the risk of suffering losses from borrowers being unable to repay their loans in scenarios up to a serious recession and a major property crash. The ratings assume you spread your money across hundreds or thousands of loans, and continue lending until all your loans are repaid. They assume you lend across 6-12 rated P2P lending accounts or IFISAs, and measure your overall performance across all of them, not against individual performances.
The 4thWay PLUS Ratings are calculated using objective criteria that can be measured and improved on over time, although no rating system is perfect. Read more about the 4thWay® PLUS Ratings.
*Commission, fees and impartial research: our service is free to you. 4thWay shows dozens of P2P lending accounts in our accurate comparison tables and we add new ones as they make it through our listing process. We receive compensation from Somo and other P2P lending companies not mentioned above either when you click through from our website and open accounts with them, or to cover the costs of conducting our calculated stress tests and ratings assessments. We vigorously ensure that this doesn't affect our editorial independence. Read How we earn money fairly with your help.
