To get the best lending results, compare all P2P lending and IFISA providers that have gone through 4thWay’s rigorous assessments.

The Attractive Way Loanpad Finds Borrowers Vs The Broker Way

By Jane Rey on 31st May, 2019 | Read more by this author

Property peer-to-peer lending sites that use loan brokers or regional managers to attract borrowers always require an extra little bit of attention from 4thWay.

Brokers don't just do the initial assessment of a loan. They are also partly salespeople, selling the loans to banks and peer-to-peer lending sites. If not on a tight leash, they can be incentivised to push borrowers that are low quality in order to earn a high fee. That fee also lowers the interest that can be charged to the borrower and paid out to individual lenders.

So 4thWay's experts look hard at the motivating forces at the P2P lending sites' headquarters, and at their own skills and experience in assessing the loans that are being sold to them.

Better than brokers is direct sourcing, like CapitalStackers* or CrowdProperty do.

A bit of background on another way to get borrowers

I've been looking into Loanpad*, which has a third way of getting loans together that is even more attractive. I'll explain how it's attractive shortly, but start with some background.

Loanpad works with another company that is called a “principle lender”. This means that it arranges loans at its own expense, but it will sometimes sell parts of the loans to other lenders.

This partner business is family-run and claims to have been operating for decades. While 4thWay's experts have no leverage over them to interview them personally they certainly appear to have a great deal of experience. This is backed up by official records of their success, with Companies House showing a very long history of profitability and growth.

Loanpad's founder was a property lawyer for 14 years, so he trusts that his contacts there have proven themselves.

Outsourcing risk

The reason this is so attractive is that Loanpad's principle lender is so confident in its abilities that it retains a large chunk of the very riskiest part of the loan.

On average, the total amount lent to borrowers so far has been 79% of the current valuation of the property. However, 44% of the property valuation is lent by the principle lenders, and they take the first loss. This means that Loanpad* lenders are lending just 35% of the property valuation, on average.

Therefore, if a loan goes bad and a property has to be forcibly sold, the loss would have to be over 60% before Loanpad lenders would lose a penny. The principle lenders would typically lose money if the loss was just over 20% and they'd lose half their money if losses were much more than 40%.

Clearly, those principle lenders are very confident about taking on the bigger part of the risk.

No fees involved

There's another advantage for Loanpad lenders. The principle lending partners themselves don’t use brokers and source deals privately, containing the costs. Naturally, they also charge higher interest rates to borrowers for the riskier slice of the loans that they keep, so the “cost” to lenders is in the form of lower interest rates. But still attractive for those incredibly contained risks!

My biggest question

The question I have is: can this method grow as Loanpad grows? Will there be enough loans available from sources like this as more lenders sign up? Loanpad says it has a few very similar partners in mind from the CEO's own list of contacts. He believes that Loanpad will be able to maintain lending at under 50% of property valuations into the future. I hope so. In the meantime, enjoy the low risks available now.

Visit Loanpad*

Read the Loanpad Review.

Independent opinion: 4thWay will help you to identify your options and narrow down your choices. We suggest what you could do, but we won't tell you what to do or where to lend; the decision is yours. We are responsible for the accuracy and quality of the information we provide, but not for any decision you make based on it. The material is for general information and education purposes only.

We are not financial, legal or tax advisors, which means that we don't offer advice or recommendations based on your circumstances and goals.

The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and not held by 4thWay. 4thWay is not regulated by ESMA or the FCA. All the specialists and researchers who conduct research and write articles for 4thWay are subject to 4thWay's Editorial Code of Practice. For more, please see 4thWay's terms and conditions.

*Commission, fees and impartial research: our service is free to you. 4thWay shows dozens of P2P lending accounts in our accurate comparison tables and we add new ones as they make it through our listing process. We receive compensation from CapitalStackers and Loanpad, and other P2P lending companies not mentioned above either when you click through from our website and open accounts with them, or to cover the costs of conducting our calculated stress tests and ratings assessments. We vigorously ensure that this doesn't affect our editorial independence. Read How we earn money fairly with your help.

Copyright BFGSL Ltd and 4thWay® 2014-2024. This peer-to-peer lending/IFISA comparison and ratings website is based on high-quality research, which requires investment. Please share content from our website by linking to it and not by copying it. See our T&Cs and Copyright Policy for more details and to buy additional rights. Acknowledge your sources.